A Single Hope

When you think about it singlenesss is a funny thing. We are all born single and at least half of us will die single but often those who are single wonder how they got there. Some who are single feel they’re too young to settle down while others may feel they are too old to be alone. When people get older they start to ask questions like “what is wrong with me? Why does no one want me…?”

As a 32 year old single man, who had to do some thinking about it recently I thought I would share some thought that others found helpful and hopefully it will help me clarify some of my thinking.

A number of years ago I stopped reading singleness book (ok it’s not like I read loads) but it would seem to me they fall into two broad categories which we often do when we think of this issue.

1. Singleness is a burden that we need to rid ourselves off.

These are basically dating manuals or ways to encourage single people not to be too disheartened, I’ve been told although I am yet to read books for women, that here is where you find “Jesus is my husband” kind of thinking. We’ll come back to that, but the basic theology seems to be it is not good to be alone so if you are single, that is not good…get married.  In the case of women they begin to think they are just not godly enough to warrant someone wanting to marry them and in the case of men, they are told that they just don’t take the initiative where they should. There may of course be truth in that but it can’t always be the case because nowhere in the Bible do we get that singleness is a sin or even the result of sin. In fact the big problem of this view is it’s hard to fit Paul’s positive view of singleness (1 Corinthians 7) with the burden mentality.

2. Singleness is the best thing.

Now the idea that singleness is the best thing seems to fit much better with Paul’s thinking but again there are problems. Although as we will see singleness is indeed a good thing and in some sense better than marriage, “the singleness is the best thing” often presents it as if we should all be going round thinking “thank goodness I am single who would want to get married”. Now  this is problematic because most singles want to get married. So if singleness is the best thing why do I want something else? Enter the guilt problem again. Now as we will see we should indeed value singleness and disparage God’s good gift is indeed serious but this is not the same thing as saying the desire for marriage is bad. As we will see it is one thing to say that singleness is a good thing it is quite another to say it is the best things.

The Gift of Singleness

 I wish that all were as I myself am. But each has his own gift from God, one of one kind and one of another. (1 Cor 7:7)

What does Paul mean by each has his own gift? What is the gift of singleness? It is very common for people to say that the gift of singleness is an ability to remain single, which most people do not have. There are significant problems with this as Christopher Ash points out:

It is a common misunderstanding to think that I know whether I have the gift of singleness by whether or not I feel happy to be single. It is often said that only if I am quite content to be unmarried and really experience no strong sexual urges or other desires for marriage, only then can I say I have this gift. And if I don’t feel content like this, then I should get married if I can.

This idea that the gift equates to the desire is wrong, for two reasons. First, if we apply the same reasoning the other way around, it makes a nonsense of marriage. With this approach, someone discerns whether he has the gift of marriedness by whether or not he is happy and content to be married. So let us suppose someone is married, but is struggling in a difficult marriage and is, frankly, not at all content in his marriedness. Does he conclude that he does not have the gift of marriedness, and go ahead and get a divorce? That would be absurd, quite apart from being forbidden in verses 10 and 11.

The second reason we know this is wrong is this: what happens if someone feels he has the gift of marriage but no suitable opportunity comes along? Is he to conclude that a good and gracious God has given him the ‘gift’ of marriage but then carelessly forgotten to make marriage possible for him? This again would be absurd.

No, I know which ‘gift’ I have by a very simple test: if I am married, I have the gift of marriage; if I am not married, I have the gift of being unmarried. My circumstances are God’s gracious gift to me, and I am to learn to accept them from his hand as such. (Christopher Ash, Married for God)

I think Ash is right. But if it is the state which is the gift from God them this will immediately change our perspective in the situation. If I am single I have a good gift from God which I should be thankful for and not resent.

Why is singleness good?

Good gifts from God are good. Perhaps that may not be a surprise but the point is not only are we to see the gift because God says it is good, although that is reason enough, but God is right so we can see the goodness.

Paul unpacks two ways in which we can see the good of singleness:

1. Singleness is good because it makes life less complicated

…But those who marry will face many troubles in this life, and I want to spare you this.(1 Corinthian 7:28b)

Trouble in the verse is not bad, or sinful, but it may be hard. Marriage is good and the troubles which come with it do not make it bad. But Paul is being realistic about marriage, that marriage brings trouble. I was listening to a pastor friend of mine who was actually discussing a group at his church which they have started to help people with same-sex attraction. It is not an issue for him, he’s married but represents the staff team there. Most the group were single, and he said he found that people in the group often idolize marriage and it is good for him to be there to say that actually the marriage, like singleness, is hard.

Now you don’t need to be in the situation of experiencing same-sex attraction to recognize the same point. Marriage is complicated it brings “trouble”. I work with Edwin who’s married with two children. And Edwin often has to go off to look after his family, whether it is driving them to school and work or looking after them when they are ill. I have never had the hassle of having to take children to the doctor. Edwin has, in that sense his life is more complicated. Of course children and family bring great joy but they also bring great complications. And they don’t always bring great joy.

This is not say that there aren’t particular struggles that singles have, there are (and they mustn’t be diminished), but it is to say that they do not have the particular struggles which come along being married and having a family which brings trouble, that is makes life complicated.

This is not rivalry as if Paul is setting marriage (bad) against singleness (good). No they are both good. But it is realism. Generally speaking a married person has a more complicated life than a single person.

It’s not that I have all my problems and I get married and they are all gone. No it is that I have particular problems being single that when I marry I then essentially swap them for a different set of problems, which is some way are be harder, so according to Paul may be best avoided.

It’s a bit like living in South Africa for me as a subject of her Majesty the Queen, that is being British. There are certain things which are more complicated here than if I were to live in the UK. For example I have to apply for a visa every three years, and panic that they don’t give it to me. Now I do that because I gain benefits, I get to live and work in South Africa, but that’s the reality. These things don’t mean it is bad to live here just that it is more complicated.

Now don’t misunderstand me, I am not saying that single lives can’t be complicated, they can be. But they would be more so if they were to marry.

I think it is best to view comparing like for like. It can be quite unhelpful when we start saying that someone has a more complicated life just because they are married compared to a particular single individual. It’s comparing like for like. So think of me, Ben, I am single. Now if Ben got married, in many ways I would be in the same situation but I would have a wife so it would be more complicated. I would have most if not all the constraints on my time I now have and I would have a wife. Which would make life more complicated.

It can be deeply unhelpful when married Christian take advantage of single people, “since they are unmarried they will be able to do this” type thinking. This must not happen, but single people should take advantage of the position that God has given them.

One of these advantages Paul particularly picks up on:

2. Singleness is good because it brings freedom

[32] I would like you to be free from concern.An unmarried man is concerned about the Lord’s affairs –how he can please the Lord. [33] But a married man is concerned about the affairs of this world— how he can please his wife— [34] and his interests are divided.

Paul follows the verse by repeating the same principle about an unmarried woman. Again this division, comparison between “the Lord’s affairs” and the “affairs of this world”, is not a division of good and bad interests. Remember both marriage and singleness are good gifts from God. The key is the division of interests not that one type of interest is better than the other. The concern of the husband is quite rightly for his wife and family, and that is his service the Lord. But the point Paul is making is that for the single person there is only one sphere in which they must offer service that is the church. But the married the person has the church and the family. Again that is not bad but that is the reality.

Again think of me and Edwin. We both work at Christ Church Hillbrow. For both of us that is our areas of ministry. However Edwin also has his family to minister to while I do not. So Edwin must be concerned about his church and his family while I can just concentrate on the church. Again that doesn’t mean that single people have no concerns outside a particular ministry or they should be exploited. As in “you must be free because you don’t have a family”, no that would be wrong.

But it is a reality that single people can be more focused on things as they do not have a family to worry about. Neither is better, Paul is just being realistic. This focus brings freedom; a single person has freedom which someone who is married does not necessarily have. This is the goodness in singleness. Single people are able to do things which married people would find very hard to do. Whether that is particular service at church or in certain places in ministry.

If I were married three years ago then I may not have come to Johannesburg. As it were it was quite easy for me to fly off for two months, which has now turned into three years, to see what it was like to serve the Lord in South Africa.

The freedom of singleness allows me to do many things which otherwise I would not be able to do. The greater simplicity of the single life leads to increased opportunities.

Many great missionaries of the past were single and they could only do what they did as they did not have a family. Both the church I grew up in and the Church I went to as a student were led by single men and as such they had a great deal of time and energy they could focus solely on the church family. The minsters of the church I was student at (Vaughan Roberts) commented:

I know that I myself would not have had nearly as much time for writing and speaking at missions or conferences if I had been married. I’ve also had more time for friendships, which have been a huge blessing to me and, I trust, to others as well.

The freedom singleness grants can bring great blessings. A single life in a sense is less complicated and this brings the freedom to be of service in areas which you otherwise would not be able to be. Too often we focus on trying to change our single status,   but actually Paul says we should focus on the opportunities and the freedom which our singleness brings.

Can you serve in a particular area? In the future if you remain single you may have more disposable income which you can give to gospel work. We are not to bemoan the gift that we have been given but we are to see it as a good gift that we can make the most of while it was there.

Singleness and the real prize

Sometimes is can seem that these two benefits of being single are a bit like a consolation prize. That is you don’t get the girl/the boy but at least life is a bit more simple and you are free to serve. It’s not great but it is something. You don’t have a wife but at least you are useful. Now I hope you have seen that Paul views it much more positively than that.

But the real surprise is that Paul is not so much denying the hardship but viewing that very hardship as good. In fact the two goods I have already mentioned I think flow from one fundamental good, which not only do we often miss, but incorporate rather than denies the hardship of singleness.

Singleness is good because it is constant reminder of the real prize. Here the work of Barry Danylak is superbly helpful.

This teaching on singleness comes in the context of the broader chapter. And although Paul is focusing on marriage and singleness the heart of his message comes in his statement of a broader principle.

 [17] Nevertheless, each one should retain the place in life that the Lord assigned to him and to which God has called him. This is the rule I lay down in all the churches.

He gives various examples of how that might work out from circumcision to slavery. These are two key distinctions in the ancient world, one defining you as part of God’s people and one not, while the other defines you as slave or free.

His application to the issue of slavery explain why changing our circumstances should not be our focus.

[20] Each one should remain in the situation which he was in when God called him.[21] Were you a slave when you were called? Don’t let it trouble you—although if you can gain your freedom, do so. [22] For he who was a slave when he was called by the Lord is the Lord’s freedman; similarly, he who was a free man when he was called is Christ’s slave. [23] You were bought at a price; do not become slaves of men.

In verse 22 he is making it clear that our relationship to God is not defined by our employment. While one might be a slave to a human master in reality they are a free man to God. Similarly if one is free man they are actually a slave to God. We are God’s, brought at a price and that matters much more than our external circumstances.

In verses 25 onward Paul applies this in a unique way:

But those who marry will face many troubles in this life, and I want to spare you this. [29] What I mean, brothers, is that the time is short. From now on those who have wives should live as if they had none; [30] those who mourn,as if they did not; those who are happy, as if they were not; those who buy something, as if it were not theirs to keep; [31] those who use the things of the world, as if not engrossed in them. For this world in its present form is passing away.

See that last phrase:

For this world in its present form is passing away.

The reason our present circumstances don’t matter is because this world is passing away. That is this life is not all there is we live for the new creation. This life is not the real prize.  The reason Paul particularly says that singleness is good then, is in this sense that singleness points more clearly to this real prize than marriage. Again this is not a good bad thing, marriage equally points to greater truths, the union of Christ and his church. But singleness better allows you to live in this world as if you don’t belong, which as Christians we do not. Or to put it the other way round if you marry it will be harder not to hold onto this world.

Again let me explain by using myself an example, If you come to my house it doesn’t feel like a home. (Curiously when I preached this at this point every single person over a certain age, who had left university, nodded) It does to some extent but whenever I go to a family home it immediately feels a lot more homely. Families put down roots, kids in school, involved in the neighbourhood things like that.

Singles do that as well but in generally the single life feels more transient. As I get older that is what I find one of the most difficult things about being single an increasing feel that I don’t quite belong anywhere. That gives me great freedom and opportunity but it can also be painful. Paul doesn’t want to diminish that pain or hardship but he wants us to realize that even that pain is good thing, as single people this helps us to see that we are not yet home. That real prize is not a home in the suburbs with 2.4 children but something far beyond that. And as we live that life out we can help married people see the same truth. It’s not that we don’t yearn to build a family or home here, we may do and there is nothing wrong with that, but as we yearn we realize a deeper truth than that, the truth that our home is not here. That this world is temporary and that actually we are hoping a permanent home and for the new creation.

I hate the Jesus is my husband kind of approach to singleness, because it is first quite awkward for men. Secondly Jesus doesn’t marry me or you individually he marries us, the church, corporately. But the real problem is it gives the impression that marriage and family life now is the aim and where I don’t have that then Jesus fills in the gap.

But Paul is saying something bigger. The absence of family now does more than remind me of what I miss out on and others have but it helps me to see more clearly that now is not what I am aiming for, it’s not the real prize.

The trouble of marriage that Paul speaks of is that the complexities of marriage makes it too easy to be caught up with the now rather than the future. The transitory nature of singleness reminds us of something bigger the transitory nature of this whole life. That the real prize is yet to come. The single hope is not marriage but the new creation.

To simply long for a spouse or a family is to long for too little! The pain of singleness points to the pain of this broken world and makes us long for a new one.

This re-articulation should draw people to the positive vision the Christian Scriptures provide for both marriage and singleness …: Christian marriage is a testimony of the utterly faithful and unchanging love of God for his people in a permanent covenant relationship with him; Christian singleness is a testimony to the complete sufficiency of Christ for the present age and gives visible witness to the hope of our eternal inheritance yet to come; …

 Danylak, Barry (2010-09-13). Redeeming Singleness: How the Storyline of Scripture Affirms the Single Life (p. 214). Good News Publishers.

While married people might get tied down the very looseness which the single experiences should point us all to the looseness with which we should all hold this world.

This is important to singles finding a valid and important place in the church. Much could be said about the church being the family that the single person does not have, but as for single people their lives should direct married people to the real prize. Just as a godly marriage should teach all of us what the relationship between Christ and the church is like so a godly single life should teach all of us to look to the real prize, the renewed world to come. As singles live lose to this world they are able to testify to that world. Ultimately the freedom and opportunity which singleness bring is the one the freedom to live a life testifying to a world to come. Of course married people can and should do this but it is easier and unique privileged of the single person to be able to do this.


  1. Well said, Benjamin! Singleness is a good gift from a good God who desires His children–single or married–to live for Him alone. We are not home yet!

  2. Thanks for your thoughtful and theologically sound post. I wrote one of those books you’ll never read – a book for single Christian women. But I like to think I dealt successfully with the “single and searching” vs. “single and satisfied” dilemma, at least from the female perspective. And yes, I hate the “Jesus is my husband” thing as well. Makes me cringe.

    I thought much about your statement that the married life is more complicated than the single one. But there is a part of me that gets all stirred up when I hear that. More complicated? Probably. But more difficult? No.

    I don’t think that singles get enough credit for how difficult it is to do life alone. Granted, I don’t have to be “concerned” with the needs of a spouse or children, but I have to be concerned about the needs of my own life…without the support, encouragement and guidance of a spouse. I must choose a church on my own, and then walk into that church alone. I have bought a home and cars on my own. I have made decisions about employment alone. God has blessed me with wonderful Christian friends and an amazing, believing family who love and support me, but there is still the fact that I am solely responsible for my life. Maybe it’s different because I am a woman and our hearts ache to be cared for and protected. It will always feel unnatural to be doing all this by myself, even if it is what God has ordained. And perhaps that is where the longing for our true “home” comes in.

    I don’t disagree with your premise. And I don’t fight God on His will for me to be single at this time in my life. Singleness is a gift, as marriage is a gift. But sometimes it would be good for both married folks and single ones to hear that the single gift, while less “complicated” is certainly not less “difficult”.

    • Thanks so much, I am amazed the number of people who have read this and grateful for your thoughtful engagement. I think I agree with you completely. This was basically a sermon, and I struggled to find a word that best made sense of Paul’s statement “…But those who marry will face many troubles in this life, and I want to spare you this” (v. 28) , so there must be a sense in which we are spared ‘troubles’ but this is not to deny the hardship of singleness (‘complicated’ is the best I came up with).
      None of this is to say that singleness is not hard, it is and I find it hard, and I agree with you we should say that more. I think singles should get credit for that, I don’t have anyone to consult on big decisions, of course I have friends and family but it is not the same. My temptation is often to put ‘hard’ and ‘good’ in two different categories but Scripture, it seems to me, often put them in the same. Not because hardship in itself is good but because it produces hope in the world to come. Part of the good of singleness is that it is hard and therefore produces hope, but it is still hard!
      Unfortunately you book is only available in Spanish on kindle (I have a GCSE in Spanish but that was a long time ago), but if I see a copy I will buy it and have a read, I’m sure I would value it.

  3. Interesting, helpful. But now as a widow ( 4 years)with 2 teenagers, I kind of have the difficulties of both worlds. God is forever our helper but my dilemma now is : Is it OK to look around for a soul mate, or should I wait for one to be ” dropped on my lap, from Heaven”? Our churches are not very big and few men would be available candidates, so it would imply some active searching.Should I feel guilty about that?

    • Thank you for your comment. It is a helpful reminder that singles are not one group someone like you, a widow with children is in a very different situation than me as a single man who has never married.

      I don’t think it is wrong to pursue marriage, we need do so in a way that doesn’t make God’s good gift to seem bad, but if we have the opportunity to marry (or remarry as a widow) then Paul says we are free to do so and if we do we have a good thing! It is hard to comment on your particular situation and I hope and pray you know wiser people than me who can help you. But I don’t think pursuing marriage is wrong, it is the way that we do it.

      God Bless,


  4. Hi Ben,

    This is my first time on your blog. Thank you for this post. I needed to read it. As a single woman, it’s encouraging to read about the blessedness of being single. I have been able to serve in my church and be focussed on one thing, that is Christ. But sometimes, it takes much to be content. Like you shared, marriage and singleness are good gifts from God. But sometimes, it is lonely. Thank you for sharing. 🙂

    I am reminded of Paul’s testimony in the book of Philippians of how he learned contentment in all kinds of circumstances. Can I be content in singleness and trust in Him to be joyful? Of course! His grace is sufficient.

    But if marriage comes, to accept it joyfully as a gift from God. 🙂 Got to get my hands on that book though by Danylak Barry.

  5. This was very encouraging. The only thing is that we are so forgetful and need to be constantly reminded of these truths. Also, I agree completely with Sharon Virkler. It is hard as a female and when you deeply desire someone to help you make important life decisions among other things.

  6. Thank you for this post. I am a single woman, a follower of Christ, and He lives in me. Yes, we are not of this world. Even though physically in our present state we are in it, we are not of it. My favourite hymn says – On Christ the solid rock i stand, all other ground is sinking sand – and yes that includes marriage. Also Jesus himself said, there will be no husbands or wives in heaven. So the bigger picture should really be, our life in Eternity with our Savior. My friend who is married, is very happy to be married 2 years now, and tells everyone how wonderful it is! She had desired to be married for a long time, and God blessed her with good man who lives in Christ. I hate to admit, but most times she makes me feel a little jelous, and i wonder if i’m missing out on something really great to have. I wonder why God has not allowed ‘us’ singles, to enjoy that good gift. As all good things come from Him. Jelousy is not from God, its not a fruit of His spirit. I battle this constantly whenever i’m around her. In this regard, i would support Paul though in a diffrent context of – ‘those who have husbands should live like they have none’. The time is short yes, and it will also help us singles and the married folks to live as one, in harmony and in Christ. I dont mean they shouldn’t be happy that they are married, but maybe tone it down a tad. Same case with singles. They should not rub their freedom in married peoples faces. Both situations have their fair share of difficulty.

  7. I wonder if a useful description of the troubles that come with marriage is time, and specifically a reduction of this precious commodity. Marriage and family take time, lots of it, and when married people become parents it reduces again significantly. I suspect this is perhaps more pertinent for mothers, but that wouldn’t always be the case.

    • Hi Kim, Thanks for your comment really helpful. I think single people do have constraints on their time but they tend to be more flexible. In your case, you cannot put off looking after the boys until tomorrow! Most my constraints are movable, this is part of the freedom that single people have.

  8. […] Resources and Further Reading -Singleness and Courtship: Lesson 1 & 3. Capitol Hill Core Seminars. -Singleness and Handling a Trivial Pursuit: http://www.raanetwork.org/trivial-pursuit/ -Nine Lies in the Not-Yet-Married Life: http://www.desiringgod.org/blog/posts/nine-lies-in-the-not-yet-married-life -A Single Hope: https://benjaminwilliamson.wordpress.com/2013/08/31/a-single-hope/ […]

  9. “Singleness allows you to live in this world as if you don’t belong.” Boy does that hit the nail on the head. I am single and feel incredible pain and alienation in a couples’ world. This alienation is not beautiful. We singles are supposed to point couples toward the Kingdom as though we’re already there. But we’re not there, not yet. It’s like saying that the starving exist to point those who are well-fed toward the Kingdom where we’ll all get to feast on spiritual food. Unless some of us die of starvation first…hunger and starving aren’t beautiful. Pain is not beautiful. Akin to saying, “you’ll get your crown when you’re dead, and the well-fed on earth will get the same crowns and be blessed both here and there.”

  10. As much as I hear pastors talk about singleness being a gift, I wonder why so few of them are single themselves. In fact, I can’t think of any high-profile pastors, ministry leaders, teachers, authors, etc. who have never been married. Why do you think that is?

Leave a Reply to benjaminwilliamson Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s